JMW Solicitors
Focusing on you
Go
Our Firm Client Services Testimonials
Careers News & PR Events
  Home   Site Map  
Contact  Us
Normal Large Larger
Anti Money Laundering
  
 

The Real Impact of Regulations 20 and 21

The new Money Laundering Regulations 2007 came into force on the 15th December 2007 and they have far reaching effects for most Law Firms in the UK. Are they being taken seriously? Are lawyers turning a blind eye to compliance especially as there is little if any evidence of enforcement action by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the previous 2003 Regulations.   

There are a number of reasons why law firms who ignore their regulatory obligations will do so at their own peril. Firstly the SRA under Regulation 24 must now monitor its members for the purpose of securing compliance with the new Regulations. Secondly the SRA has indicated that it intends to audit law firms on a Nationwide basis to check that they are fully compliant and have set up adequate systems as required by the Regulations. Make no mistake about it professional sanctions will be imposed and there will be criminal prosecutions against the worst offenders.

So what must Law Firms do to protect themselves under the new regime? First and foremost they must ensure that they have the necessary systems and internal procedures in place to show compliance with Regulations 20 and 21. Let’s take a closer look at these two important Regulations.

Regulation 20 requires that those organisations working in the Regulated Sector must establish and maintain appropriate and risk-sensitive policies and procedures relating to the following:-

• customer due diligence measures and ongoing monitoring:
• reporting:
• record-keeping:
• internal control:
• risk assessment and management:
• the monitoring and management of compliance with, and the internal communication of, such policies and procedures:

The policies and procedures must also make provision for identifying and scrutinising (a) complex or unusually large transactions (b) unusual patterns of transactions which have no apparent economic or visible purpose and (c) any other activity which is regarded as particularly likely by its nature to be related to money laundering or terrorist financing.

Furthermore, the policies and procedures must accommodate provision for determining whether a client or potential client is a politically exposed person.

Regulation 21 requires that those organisations working in the Regulated Sector must take appropriate measures to ensure that Relevant Employees (curiously this phrase would not appear to include Partners although this cannot have been the intention) are:-

• made aware of the law relating to money laundering and terrorist financing; and
• regularly given training in how to recognise and deal with transactions and other activities which may be related to money laundering or terrorist financing.

At first glance it may be thought that a brief internal training session highlighting the requirements of Regulations 20 and 21 will satisfy compliance. It most certainly won’t and adopting such an approach will inevitably lead to problems. Lawyers will need to completely review their existing systems and put in place written polices and procedures that are well thought out and can be shown to work in practice.

This will be no easy task and will involve a full risk assessment of existing clients, potential clients and work types. It will also involve the creation of a detailed manual or internal guidelines which will set out in a user friendly and easy to understand manner the firms systems for mitigating the risk of money laundering activity. Such systems should take on board the compulsory requirements of the Regulations and also the comprehensive guidance on compliance published by the Law Society on the 22nd February 2008.

Law firms must appreciate that compliance with the Regulations is not optional and the sooner they get their act together the better. Good systems, and the effective internal communication of them, will enable firms to illustrate compliance with each of the specific requirements set out in Regulations 20 and 21. Poor systems will result in uncertainty, inefficiency and inconsistency not to mention possible prosecution or professional sanctions.

Doing the hard work now will provide a platform that will protect your firm against the likelihood of enforcement action. Be aware also that under Rule 5 of the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 firms must have management arrangements in place that ensure compliance with the 2007 Money Laundering Regulations.

Bill Jones is the Managing Partner of JMW Solicitors in Manchester and he is also Managing Director of ML Solutions 4U Limited a company which specialises in providing anti-money laundering solutions to law firms.  Further information can be found about these services at www.mlsolutions4u.co.uk. Alternatively Bill can be contacted by e-mail at bill.jones@jmw.co.uk.