Jade Halliday-Mitchell

Jade graduated from university with a 1st Class Law Degree. She then went on to study the Legal Practice Course combined with a Masters in Law.

Jade joined JMW in October 2020 as a Paralegal in the Business Crime and Regulation (‘BCR’) department, before later being promoted to Senior Paralegal. Jade completed her Training Contract with JMW Solicitors, achieving early qualification as a Solicitor in March 2025.

Jade specialises in motoring offences, with an expertise ranging from exceptional hardship applications and retention of driving licences, to more complex matters such as causing serious injury/death by careless/dangerous driving.

Jade prides herself on treating all matters with the same level of importance and attention, giving every case the thorough consideration it deserves.

She now represents clients across various UK Courts, ensuring a resilient and methodological approach to matters of all descriptions.

Over recent years, Jade’s knowledge in the Criminal Law sector has developed to specialise in serious crime. Such matters are inclusive, but not limited to:

• Murder/manslaughter;
• Violent offences; and
• Sexual/historic sexual offences.
• Ensuring approachability, understanding and a non-judgmental space for Clients is a key component to Jade’s approach and success in such cases.

Jade works alongside a dedicated team who also specialise in these matters, ensuring a collective, tenacious and forward-thinking approach, whereby each matter is considered from all angles.

Jade is recognised for her persistence and determination to achieve results.

Motoring

1. R v AD - Death by Dangerous Driving – Newcastle Crown Court - A methodological and diligent approach, using the Team’s network of reputable chambers and independent defence experts meant that a formal written advice on trial prospects, and a telecommunications expert report were received prior to the first appearance. The importance of whether the mobile phone use was ‘prolonged’ would mean the difference between a 12 or 6 year custodial starting point. At sentence, the Team were successful in opposing the prosecution starting point of 12 years custody, instead successfully advocating that AD’s matter warranted a Culpability B starting point of 6 years. The Sentencing Judge agreed with the defence submissions that the phone use was not prolonged. Following delicate and precise submissions in mitigation, alongside the 33% reduction afforded due to ‘credit for a guilty plea’, AD was sentenced to a total of 3 years and 2 months (to serve 19 months in custody) – a stark contrast to the Prosecution’s 12 years. The minimum driving disqualification was imposed - Woman allegedly killed quad bike rider by dangerous driving in Northumberland | Chronicle Live. Driver using Snapchat on phone killed farmer in Northumberland crash - BBC News
2. R v KS - Death by Dangerous Driving – Bristol Crown Court - KS was represented by a different firm of solicitors and a different barrister at Trial. Post-trial, he was convicted by majority. KS was unhappy with his legal team and therefore transferred representation to JMW Solicitors following a recommendation, ahead of his sentencing. From the outset, Hojol and Jade were aware that the prosecution sought to place KS’ case into Culpability B, with a sentencing range of 4-9 years. After a meticulous review of the evidence, the defence team formed the view that KS’ case should be placed within culpability C, which carries a sentencing range of 2-5 years custody. Advocating that KS’ case fell within culpability C was a delicate and sensitive task; however, the Sentencing Judge praised the defence approach and ultimately agreed with the detailed submissions.The Sentence handed down was 2 years (to serve 1 year in immediate custody) – the bottom end of the sentencing guidelines for any case involving a tragic death caused by dangerous driving. The minimum driving disqualification was imposed - Man sentenced for causing death by dangerous driving | Avon and Somerset Police
3. R v JB – Death by Dangerous Driving – York Crown Court – This case drew substantial attention. This involved mobile phone evidence, forensic experts on collisions, weather experts and also a GPS expert. We were able to demonstrate our client was not on his mobile phone at the time the accident occurred. Consequently, the Jury acquitted JB of Death by dangerous Driving and the charge was reduced to Death by Careless Driving - Driver James Bryan who killed cyclist in fatal crash jailed - BBC News 
4. R v KC – Drink Driving – KC was a serving police officer and was at risk of community service and an alcohol monitoring tag, following a charge of Drink Driving. At Court, Jade successfully advocated that the Judge on this occasion should deviate from the sentencing guidelines and impose a fine and driving disqualification (reduced by a drink driver course) - Drink Driving – Community Service Avoided for Serving Officer - JMW
5. R v NR – Speeding and Manifestly Excessive Sentence – Jade attended the Court hearing and successfully applied for the case to be re-opened, on the basis that the sentence was wrong in law and manifestly excessive. Jade then advocated for a reduced fine in accordance with the guidelines. The Magistrates’ agreed with Jade’s submissions, and thus reduced the financial penalty to £576.00. The Bench waived the prosecution costs. Mr. R was recompensed for £14,928.00 - Speeding – Excessive Fine Reduced for Footballer Client
6. R v A – Dangerous Driving, No Insurance, Driving Whilst Disqualified - Mr. A was facing a potential sentence of up to 1 year and 6 months in custody. Due to the expert representation of JMW Solicitors’ Motoring Department, Mr. A was sentenced to 26-weeks imprisonment, suspended for 18-months, alongside other secondary sentences and ancillary orders, avoiding immediate custody - Immediate Custody Avoided – Dangerous Driving No Insurance, Driving Otherwise than in Accordance with a Licence, and Driving Whilst Disqualified - JMW
7. R v G – Death by Careless Driving - The Sentencing Guidelines for this offence indicate a maximum custodial sentence of 5-years imprisonment. Following expert representation and case preparation, Mr. G was sentenced to community service, rehabilitation days, a driving disqualification of 18-months and costs of £199.00. Custody (suspended or immediate) was avoided - Death by Careless Driving – Custodial Sentence Avoided - JMW
8. R v SD – Using a Mobile Phone Whilst Driving – SD had 6 existing penalty points on her driving licence. The imposition of a further 6 penalty points for this offence would have meant that she was a ‘totter’ and would have been liable to a disqualification for a minimum period of 6-months. Prior to the Trial, Jade made multiple disclosure requests, persistently corresponding with the Crown in order to protect Mrs. D’s interests and emphasise that the case should not proceed on an evidential basis. Following such correspondence with the Crown Prosecution Service, the charge of Using a Mobile Phone Whilst Driving was discontinued without the need for a Trial, and SD faced no further prosecution - Case Discontinued – Using a Mobile Phone Whilst Driving - JMW
9. R v SS – Successful Appeal Against Driving Disqualification - Expert legal representation resulted in a successful appeal against Sentence. The Crown Court Judge determined that the defendant had ‘suffered enough’ and reduced the overall fine down to just £50.

Serious Crime

1. R v C – Conspiracy to Commit Murder - ROCU Investigation and NCA Most Wanted - Manchester Crown Court. This involved extradition from Portugal and thereafter a Murder trial whereby C was accused of being involved in an Organised Crime Group (OCG), resulting in the death of a rival member of a separate OCG. Callum Halpin: One of UK's most wanted fugitives arrested in Portugal in connection with Manchester murder | UK News | Sky News
2. R v C – ROCU - Attempted Murder – Lewes Crown Court – This involved rival motorcycle groups seeking to attack one another. One individual was severely injured with multiple wounds. Negotiations took place to remove the attempted murder charged to a section 18 GBH. The client was extremely pleased. Hells Angels left rival biker fighting for life after ‘revenge’ attack
3. R v N – Harassment and Stalking – Aylesbury Crown Court - This was a clear case of manipulation by the complainant of the Police. However, the Police force failed to recognise this. N was subsequently charged (third attempt by the complainant). This case proceeded to the trial and the case was successfully withdrawn on the day of trial, following a preparation of a defence bundle which showed the web of lies.
4. R v HL – Coercive and Controlling Behaviour – Manchester Crown Court – This case involved a very sensitive familial relationship whereby HL was accused of coercive and controlling behaviour towards his now deceased mother. Jade worked tirelessly to obtain HL’s instructions and drafted meticulous written representations which highlighted to the Crown that it was not in the public interest to pursue HL for such charge when he too had been a potential victim. The Crown ultimately withdrew the charge.
5. R v CH – Rape – Liverpool Crown Court – This involved an alleged rape following an entangled relationship with the Complainant. CH strenuously denied the allegation and the team had to ensure a detailed and non-judgmental approach was taken. Ultimately, following a lengthy trial, CH was acquitted.
6. R v JA -  Robbery (x2) and Actual Bodily Harm - Following extensive research and preparation surrounding social media forums and the use of WhatsApp and Snapchat, it became apparent that the complainants were inconsistent in their account on more than one occasion. In fact, the complainants had targeted the vulnerable defendant via an online dating site where the female ‘catfishes’ and then ‘honey traps’ the defendant, initiating conversation with the aim of meeting up with him and robbing him. JA was found not guilty by Jury of all counts.

Jade is a member of both the Law Society and ‘Women in Criminal Law’ Network.

Jade regularly attends the gym and enjoys running. Jade believes remaining active despite a busy career is essential to both mental and physical health.  In 2024 Jade completed a SkyDive for catastrophic injury charity: Day One Trauma Support. She has also worked alongside the charity ‘Manchester Youth Zone’, assisting and working with children in deprived areas of Manchester.

Successful Appeal Against Driving Disqualification

Drink Driving – Community Service Avoided for Serving Officer

Immediate Custody Avoided – Dangerous Driving No Insurance

Death by Careless Driving – Custodial Sentence Avoided

Case Discontinued – Using a Mobile Phone Whilst Driving

Speeding – Excessive Fine Reduced for Footballer Client

Unanimous Acquittal of 2 Counts of Sexual Assault by Penetration

• "Needed to find a solicitor for a case and found JMW got a great quick polite response helped all the way through Jade was fantastic sorting everything out  and on the day Paddy came listened to what I had to say processed it to legal terms and got the fantastic result of no prosecution was really happy with it, also a quick mention Louise that took payments was polite understanding. Thank you will be contacting again if ever need there services again" Trustpilot
• "The support and Guidance from Hojol and Jade has been amazing. They were there for us every step of the way. Helping me and my family navigate a very difficult time in our lives. We are very grateful and would recommend to anyone" Trustpilot
• "Simply cannot rate Hojol and Jade at JMW enough. I had (to my mind!) a very complicated case to deal with and had wrongly received penalty points and a summons to court.  From the moment I spoke to Hojol, he provided clear and concise options through every stage and was completely transparent about the costs involved.  After that first conversation, Hojol and Jade handled everything efficiently and inspired absolute confidence.   Would not hesitate to recommend Hojol and Jade at JMW if you need expert representation for motoring and driving offences." Trustpilot
• "I cannot thank JMW Solicitors enough, and in particular Jade Halliday-Mitchell. From the very start, Jade's support meant I never once felt worried about my case. She was reassuring, professional, and always kept me informed, which gave me complete confidence throughout the process. Thanks to her hard work and guidance, I achieved the outcome I desired. I would highly recommend Jade and the JMW team." Trustpilot
• "I appointed JMW to represent me. The service I received from Hojol and Jade was at a very high level. The communication was on going throughout the matter. They explained the process and what would happen on the day. The knowledge of the legal matters and being able to explain them in simple terms was valuable. The acted professionally at all times and represented me at court." Trustpilot
• "What a team…Hojol and Jade. Attention to detail was exceptional. Totally committed to achieving the best possible outcome in a difficult situation. Very friendly and approachable explaining each process at various stages, even working whilst on annual leave and after hours to answer any queries. Totally professional in every aspect of their duties." Trustpilot
• "This law firm was a pleasure to work with. Jade, Hojol & Charles were truly magnificent with my case. I had a very complicated case and a disqualification to me was certain but Charles represented me and I managed to keep my license. Worth every single penny. Terrific people. Terrific professionals. Highly recommended." Trustpilot
• "Helen and Jade were absolutely fantastic. Service was second to none and they helped me through an extremely difficult time with absolute professionalism!" Trustpilot
• "I can thoroughly recommend Helen Kelsall and Jade Halliday-Mitchell who both worked very hard to obtain a positive outcome for me in court. Well done and thank you so very much." Trustpilot
• "I had an excellent experience with JMW Solicitors while dealing with a road traffic offence. The whole team was professional, approachable, and very supportive throughout my case." Trustpilot
• "A special thank you to Jade, Hoj, and Richard, who were especially helpful. They guided me clearly through each step, kept me well informed, and showed genuine care during what was a stressful time. Their expertise and reassurance made all the difference, and I’m very grateful for the way they handled everything.
  I would highly recommend JMW Solicitors to anyone needing legal representation, particularly for road traffic matters. They truly go above and beyond for their clients." Trustpilot